Skip to main content

Edward Said on Orientalism

          on 'Orientalism': Edward Said
                     

A brief summary of Said's Interview

Edward Said's book 'Orientalism' has been profoundly influential in a diverse range of disciplines its publication in 1978. In this engaging interview, he talks about the context within which the book was conceived, its main themes and how its original thesis relates to the contemporary understanding of "the orient."

Orientalism is a revolutionary study middle east such a postcolonial they as well as the influence diverse English, anthropology critical, science and cultural studies. Orientalism tries the answer to the question of why we think 🤔 of the middle east like as they believe and act even though orientalism asks have to come to understand people, strangers, look difference by virtue of the colour of the skin.

Said argues that the western especially American understanding of the middle east as a place full of villains and terrorists ruled by Islamic fundamentalism produces a deeply distorted image of the diversity and complexity of millions of Arab peoples. One of the most aspects of Edward said has made clear is how the media misleads the non-orientals by representing a non-realistic image of the orient. To put it differently, what the Americans and Europeans see on tv or social media and read newspapers impacts their approximation of the 'other' as they start to misunderstand their culture and degrades them to non-humans, violent and war-ridden. The western express their point of view about the orient depending on their aspects of life as they see themselves as ideal human beings.

♣  on understanding Israel - Palestinian issue
                     

It's conflicting about Israel and Palestine. This conflict is often cast as a long term beef going back thousands of years and rooted in a clash between religion, but that's not quite true. What is true is that the conflict is immensely complicated, and just about everyone in the world has an opinion about it. One of the biggest myths about Israel - Palestine conflict is that it been going on for centuries, that this is all about ancient religious hatreds.

In fact, while religion is involved, the conflict is mostly about two groups of people who claim the same land. And it really only goes back about a century, to the early 1900s. At its heart, it is a conflict between two self-determination movement - the Jewish zionist project and the Palestinian nationalist project that lay claim to the same territory.

Also, we can't blame Britain for this whole mess. They definitely did have a part in the current mess but the rivalry between two ethnic groups had been going on long before and the Jews were planning on moving back. America was also backing the Jewish 🕎 🕍🔯  population after world war 2 for the financial support given to them by American🗽 jews in the war. So the conflict between Jews and Palestinians was really unavoidable regardless of how Britain divided the land.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Light House: Thinking Activity

To the Lighthouse: Virginia Woolf                    1. How can you explain that 'what' Virginia Woolf wanted to say (for example, the complexity of human relationship, the everyday battles that people are at in their relationship with near and dear ones, the struggle of a female artist against the values of middle/upper-class society etc) can only be said in the way she has said? (Key: The 'How' of the narrative technique is to be discussed along with features of Stream of Consciousness technique which helps Woolf to put in an effective manner what she experienced in abstractions.) =). There are other techniques also through which, one can explain all the thing what Virginia Woolf wanted to say, but the technique of Stream of Consciousness seems the best to explain as the whole novel is highly psychological where the complexity of relationships as well as the problems in day to day life with near relations due to such circumstances are being tried to explore by

Character of Friday in Robinson Crusoe for postcolonial aspect in the context of A Grain of Wheat

Thinking Activity: In the Context of A Grain of Wheat. How is the Native represented by colonizers? Do a character study of Friday in Robinson Crusoe. Throughout the history of mankind, there has always been an individual or a group of individuals who have deemed himself to be superior. This master-slave relationship has occurred skin colour. Friday is slave and Crusoe is his master. This relationship has also occurred in A Grain of Wheat. Britain is ruled upon Kenyan people. English people and the English language are strongly used, therefore, natives civilization does not understand the English language. Negros was a black people of Africa and people was a master (superior). Englishman has sold African people as a thing. During the 1930s, the first colonial laws were authorized formally establishing the institution of slavery. In the context of A Grain of Wheat, both the colonizer and the colonized feel morally justified in their pursuits, colonialism is ultimately an immoral an

BA: TY: Play: The Hairy Ape

Play: The Hairy Ape by Eugene O'Neill Yank as a Tragic hero or 'Hairy Ape' as a modern tragedy Introduction:- Most of O'Neill's plays are tragedies 'Hairy Ape' is also a great tragedy. But it is not a conventional tragedy in the Aristotlelian tradition but a modern tragedy. It's subject matter and theme is the same, but it's form is different. It is a great tragedy with a great difference. Yank as a tragic hero: not a man of high rank- Aristotle laid down that the hero of tragedy must be exceptional individual, man of high rank, a king or a prince so that his fall from his greatness would arouse the tragic emotions of pity and fear. All Shakespeare's heroes fulfil this requirement. But Yank, the hero of 'Hairy Ape' is not a man of high rank. He is not a king or a prince or some extra ordinary human being. He is a common stoker whose business is to shove fuel into the furnace of the ships engine. For long hours, he has to work